Patent Foramen Ovale (Pfo) Closure Devices Remnant From The Fetal Circulation That Usually Closes At Birth
![]() |
Patent Foramen Ovale (Pfo) Closure Devices |
Introduction
A Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) is a flap-like opening between the two upper
chambers of the heart. It is a remnant from the fetal circulation that usually
closes at birth. However, in about 25% of the general population, it remains
open or patent. While a PFO is usually harmless, in some cases it can allow
blood clots to pass from the right side of the heart to the left side and
travel to the brain, causing a stroke. PFO closure devices are minimally
invasive implants used to close a PFO and prevent future strokes.
Types of PFO Closure Devices
There are multiple types of PFO closure devices approved by the FDA for closing
PFOs and reducing the risk of stroke. Some of the common devices include:
- Amplatzer PFO Occluder: Made by Abbott, this was the first FDA approved PFO
closure device in 2001. It is a self-expanding nitinol mesh device that is
deployed via a catheter through the femoral or jugular vein.
- GORE Cardioform Septal Occluder: Manufactured by W.L. Gore and Associates, it
was approved in 2015. Similar to the Amplatzer device, it is a nitinol mesh
structure that is compacted inside a delivery catheter.
- Figulla Flex II Occluder: Made by Occlutech, this device received FDA
approval in 2020. It has flexible nitinol wires and polyester fabric to allow
maximal adaptation to a patient's anatomy.
- Cera PFO Occluder: This device by Cardinal Health uses low-profile silicone
material for soft, flexible closure of the PFO channel. It gained FDA approval
in 2022.
How PFO Closure Devices Work
All Patent
Foramen Ovale (PFO) Closure Devices closure devices are implanted using
a minimally invasive catheter procedure. Under light anesthesia, a thin
catheter is inserted through a small incision in the groin or neck and guided
to the heart under fluoroscopic guidance. The compressed closure device is
passed through the catheter and released in the heart. It expands to cover the
flap-like opening of the PFO from both sides. Over time, tissues grow over the
device, permanently sealing the opening. This prevents blood clots from
entering the left side of the heart and traveling to the brain. Implantation
takes around an hour and patients can resume normal activities within a day.
Benefits of PFO Closure
Closing a PFO offers several benefits compared to medical management alone:
- Reduced risk of future stroke - Clinical studies show a 45-90% reduced risk
of recurrent stroke after PFO closure compared to medical treatment.
- Earlier return to normal activities - As it is a minimally invasive procedure
compared to open heart surgery, recovery is much faster. Patients can resume
work within 2-3 days.
- Improved quality of life - By preventing future neurological events, PFO
closure improves long term life quality, independence and productivity.
- Reduced need for blood thinners - For patients with a high stroke risk, PFO
closure may eliminate or reduce long term need for anticoagulant medications
that carry bleeding risks.
- Peace of mind - Closing the PFO channel results in long lasting closure,
ensuring stroke risk is addressed at the anatomical level rather than just
managed medically over time.
Patient Selection for PFO Closure
Not all PFO patients need closure, and careful selection is important. Ideal
candidates are those who:
- Have had an otherwise unexplained stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA).
- Have a PFO and one or more stroke risk factors like atrial septal aneurysm.
- Failed or are inappropriate candidates for medical management alone with
blood thinners.
- Have had multiple or recurrent neurological events despite medication use.
It is generally not advised for patients with small PFOs without stroke history
or other eligible criteria. A multidisciplinary team approach including
cardiologists and neurologists is needed for patient evaluation and treatment
decision making.
Safety of PFO Closure Devices
While very effective, PFO closure does have some risks like with any implant
procedure:
- Possible device embolization or malposition requiring intervention
- Bleeding, infection, or arrhythmias from the catheter insertion site
- Rare cases of pericardial effusion or device erosion into heart chambers.
However, with experienced operators, complications are very low (1-2% rate).
Appropriate patient selection also minimizes risks. Long term, these implanted
devices have excellent durability and safety profiles up to 15 years after
implantation.
Conclusion
In summary, PFO closure using the minimally invasive implant devices available
is an important treatment option for reducing stroke recurrence risk in select
patients. By sealing the opening permanently, it addresses the anatomical cause
at its source. With a low side effect profile and high patient satisfaction,
PFO closure provides an effective alternative to lifelong medical management of
PFO associated stroke risk when indicated clinically.
Get
more insights, On Patent
Foramen Ovale (PFO) Closure Devices
Comments
Post a Comment